Fast forward to present day in London. The painting is hanging on the wall of a sleek, glass enveloped house of award winning architectural design. Sunshine beams through the walls in the day and stars twinkle through the transparent, retractable roof at night. I think, "Ahh, a beautiful setting in which to be immersed - such a welcome contrast to the first part of the book." The pleasure is short lived. Inside lives a young, lonely, grieving woman, widow of the architect who designed and built the home. More angst.
The mystery the book attempts to unveil is the story of how the painting came to be where it is. Was it legitimately transferred or unjustly obtained through wartime seizures? Establishing the link revealing the provenance of the painting is weakly and painfully-slowly unveiled. I wanted to know the answer, but upon finishing the novel, I concluded that finding out had not been worth my effort.
In contrast, you can read a very positive review of the book by the Washington Times in November of 2013. The reviewer John Greenya stated, "By the end, The Girl You Left Behind had become not just a picture-perfect historical novel, but also a true mystery-thriller. And I no longer cared how many romance novels Ms. Moyes had written."
Here is an image of Henri Matisse and one of his paintings Purple Robe and Anemones. I might guess that the painting of Sophie titled The Girl You Left Behind might look something like this work of Matisse.
Maybe so, maybe not; but frankly I do not care. Even this artist and subject look bored. But do not take my word for it. Maybe I am merely a shallow romance-oriented kind of gal.
Ugh... I hate that when really, you just have ONE question, and you have to keep reading a terrible book to find out. I am skeptical of that much anthropomorphizing of a painting (sounds more like a college-level "creative writing challenge" than the premise of a good book. And I think there's actually a HUGE hint in the pretentious tone that reviewer takes: I see that, and thing there's someone who'd rather read high-falutin' nonsense than a good - if predictable - page turner.
ReplyDelete